Stability of matter explained

In physics, the stability of matter refers to the ability of a large number of charged particles, such as electrons and protons, to form macroscopic objects without collapsing or blowing apart due to electromagnetic interactions. Classical physics predicts that such systems should be inherently unstable due to attractive and repulsive electrostatic forces between charges, and thus the stability of matter was a theoretical problem that required a quantum mechanical explanation.

The first solution to this problem was provided by Freeman Dyson and Andrew Lenard in 1967–1968,[1] [2] but a shorter and more conceptual proof was found later by Elliott Lieb and Walter Thirring in 1975 using the Lieb–Thirring inequality.[3] The stability of matter is partly due to the uncertainty principle and the Pauli exclusion principle.[4]

Description of the problem

In statistical mechanics, the existence of macroscopic objects is usually explained in terms of the behavior of the energy or the free energy with respect to the total number

N

of particles. More precisely, the ground-state energy should be a linear function of

N

for large values of

N

.[5] In fact, if the ground-state energy behaves proportional to

Na

for some

a ≠ 1

, then pouring two glasses of water would provide an energy proportional to

(2N)a-2Na=(2a-2)Na

, which is enormous for large

N

. A system is called stable of the second kind or thermodynamically stable when the free energy is bounded from below by a linear function of

N

. Upper bounds are usually easy to show in applications, and this is why scientists have worked more on proving lower bounds.

Neglecting other forces, it is reasonable to assume that ordinary matter is composed of negative and positive non-relativistic charges (electrons and ions), interacting solely via the Coulomb's interaction. A finite number of such particles always collapses in classical mechanics, due to the infinite depth of the electron-nucleus attraction, but it can exist in quantum mechanics thanks to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Proving that such a system is thermodynamically stable is called the stability of matter problem and it is very difficult due to the long range of the Coulomb potential. Stability should be a consequence of screening effects, but those are hard to quantify.

Let us denote by

HN,K

N
\Delta
xi
2
=-\sum
i=1
K
\Delta
Rk
2Mk
-\sum
k=1
Kzk
|xi-Rk|
-\sum
k=1

+\sum1\leq

1
|xi-xj|

+\sum1\leq

zkzm
|Rk-Rm|

the quantum Hamiltonian of

N

electrons and

K

nuclei of charges

z1,...,zK

and masses

M1,...,MK

in atomic units. Here
3\partial
\Delta=\nabla
jj
denotes the Laplacian, which is the quantum kinetic energy operator. At zero temperature, the question is whether the ground state energy (the minimum of the spectrum of

HN,K

) is bounded from below by a constant times the total number of particles:The constant

C

can depend on the largest number of spin states for each particle as well as the largest value of the charges

zk

. It should ideally not depend on the masses

M1,...,MK

so as to be able to consider the infinite mass limit, that is, classical nuclei.

History

19th century physics

At the end of the 19th century it was understood that electromagnetic forces held matter together. However two problems co-existed.[6] Earnshaw's theorem from 1842, proved that no charged body can be in a stable equilibrium under the influence of electrostatic forces alone. The second problem was that James Clerk Maxwell had shown that accelerated charge produces electromagnetic radiation, which in turn reduces its motion. In 1900, Joseph Larmor suggested the possibility of an electromagnetic system with electrons in orbits inside matter. He showed that if such system existed, it could be scaled down by scaling distances and vibrations times, however this suggested a modification to Coulomb's law at the level of molecules. Classical physics was thus unable to explain the stability of matter and could only be explained with quantum mechanics which was developed at the beginning of the 20th century.

Dyson–Lenard solution

Freeman Dyson showed[7] in 1967 that if all the particles are bosons, then the inequality cannot be true and the system is thermodynamically unstable. It was in fact later proved that in this case the energy goes like

N7/5

instead of being linear in

N

.[8] [9] It is therefore important that either the positive or negative charges are fermions. In other words, stability of matter is a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle. In real life electrons are indeed fermions, but finding the right way to use Pauli's principle and prove stability turned out to be remarkably difficult. Michael Fischer and David Ruelle formalized the conjecture in 1966[10] According to Dyson, Fischer and Ruelled offered a bottle of Champagne to anybody who could prove it.[11] Dyson and Lenard found the proof of a year later and therefore got the bottle.

Lieb–Thirring inequality

As was mentioned before, stability is a necessary condition for the existence of macroscopic objects, but it does not immediately imply the existence of thermodynamic functions. One should really show that the energy really behaves linearly in the number of particles. Based on the Dyson–Lenard result, this was solved in an ingenious way by Elliott Lieb and Joel Lebowitz in 1972.[12]

According to Dyson himself, the Dyson–Lenard proof is "extraordinarily complicated and difficult" and relies on deep and tedious analytical bounds. The obtained constant

C

in was also very large. In 1975, Elliott Lieb and Walter Thirring found a simpler and more conceptual proof, based on a spectral inequality, now called the Lieb–Thirring inequality.[13] They got a constant

C

which was by several orders of magnitude smaller than the Dyson–Lenard constant and had a realistic value.They arrived at the final inequalitywhere

Z=max(zk)

is the largest nuclear charge and

q

is the number of electronic spin states which is 2. Since

N1/3K2/3\leqN+K

, this yields the desired linear lower bound . The Lieb–Thirring idea was to bound the quantum energy from below in terms of the Thomas–Fermi energy. The latter is always stable due to a theorem of Edward Teller which states that atoms can never bind in Thomas–Fermi model.[14] [15] [16] The Lieb–Thirring inequality was used to bound the quantum kinetic energy of the electrons in terms of the Thomas–Fermi kinetic energy
\int
R3
53
\rho(x)

d3x

. Teller's no-binding theorem was in fact also used to bound from below the total Coulomb interaction in terms of the simpler Hartree energy appearing in Thomas–Fermi theory. Speaking about the Lieb–Thirring proof, Dyson wrote later[17] [18]

Further work

The Lieb–Thirring approach has generated many subsequent works and extensions. (Pseudo-)Relativistic systems[19] [20] [21] [22] magnetic fields[23] [24] quantized fields[25] [26] [27] and two-dimensional fractional statistics (anyons)[28] [29] have for instance been studied since the Lieb–Thirring paper. The form of the bound has also been improved over the years. For example, one can obtain a constant independent of the number

K

of nuclei.[30]

Bibliography

Notes and References

  1. Dyson . Freeman J. . Lenard . A. . Stability of Matter. I . Journal of Mathematical Physics . March 1967 . 8 . 3 . 423–434 . 10.1063/1.1705209. 1967JMP.....8..423D .
  2. Lenard . A. . Dyson . Freeman J. . Stability of Matter. II . Journal of Mathematical Physics . May 1968 . 9 . 5 . 698–711 . 10.1063/1.1664631. 1968JMP.....9..698L . free .
  3. Lieb . Elliott H. . Thirring . Walter E. . Bound for the Kinetic Energy of Fermions Which Proves the Stability of Matter . . 15 September 1975 . 35 . 11 . 687–689 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.687. 1975PhRvL..35..687L .
  4. Book: Marder, Michael P. . Condensed Matter Physics . 2010-11-17 . John Wiley & Sons . 978-0-470-94994-8 . en.
  5. Book: Ruelle . David . Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results . April 1999 . 10.1142/4090. 978-981-02-3862-9. World Scientific. 1999smrr.book.....R .
  6. Jones . W . 1980-04-01 . Earnshaw's theorem and the stability of matter . European Journal of Physics . 1 . 2 . 85–88 . 10.1088/0143-0807/1/2/004 . 1980EJPh....1...85J . 0143-0807.
  7. Dyson . Freeman J. . Ground-State Energy of a Finite System of Charged Particles . Journal of Mathematical Physics . August 1967 . 8 . 8 . 1538–1545 . 10.1063/1.1705389. 1967JMP.....8.1538D .
  8. Conlon . Joseph G. . Lieb . Elliott H. . Yau . Horng-Tzer . Horng-Tzer Yau . TheN 7/5 law for charged bosons . Communications in Mathematical Physics . September 1988 . 116 . 3 . 417–448 . 10.1007/BF01229202. 1988CMaPh.116..417C . free.
  9. Lieb . Elliott H. . Solovej . Jan Philip . Ground State Energy of the Two-Component Charged Bose Gas . Communications in Mathematical Physics . December 2004 . 252 . 1–3 . 485–534 . 10.1007/s00220-004-1144-1. math-ph/0311010 . 2004CMaPh.252..485L . free.
  10. Fisher . Michael E. . Ruelle . David . The Stability of Many-Particle Systems . Journal of Mathematical Physics . February 1966 . 7 . 2 . 260–270 . 10.1063/1.1704928. 1966JMP.....7..260F .
  11. Web site: Dyson . Freeman . A bottle of champagne to prove the stability of matter . Youtube . 5 September 2016 . 22 June 2022.
  12. Lieb . Elliott H . Lebowitz . Joel L . The constitution of matter: Existence of thermodynamics for systems composed of electrons and nuclei . . December 1972 . 9 . 3 . 316–398 . 10.1016/0001-8708(72)90023-0 . free.
  13. Lieb . Elliott H. . Thirring . Walter E. . Inequalities for the Moments of the Eigenvalues of the Schrodinger Hamiltonian and Their Relation to Sobolev Inequalities . Studies in Mathematical Physics: Essays in Honor of Valentine Bargmann . 31 December 2015 . 269–304 . 10.1515/9781400868940-014. 978-1-4008-6894-0 .
  14. Lieb . Elliott H. . Simon . Barry . Thomas-Fermi Theory Revisited . . 10 September 1973 . 31 . 11 . 681–683 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.681. 1973PhRvL..31..681L .
  15. Lieb . Elliott H . Simon . Barry . The Thomas-Fermi theory of atoms, molecules and solids . . January 1977 . 23 . 1 . 22–116 . 10.1016/0001-8708(77)90108-6. free.
  16. Lieb . Elliott H. . Thomas-fermi and related theories of atoms and molecules . Reviews of Modern Physics . 1 October 1981 . 53 . 4 . 603–641 . 10.1103/RevModPhys.53.603. 1981RvMP...53..603L .
  17. Book: Lieb . Elliott H. . The Stability of Matter: From Atoms to Stars: Selecta of Elliott H. Lieb . 2005 . Springer . 978-3-540-22212-5 . Thirring . Walter . 10.1007/b138553.
  18. Web site: Dyson . Freeman . 5 September 2016 . Lieb and Thirring clean up my matter stability proof . 22 June 2022 . youtube.
  19. Lieb . Elliott H. . Yau . Horng-Tzer . Horng-Tzer Yau . The stability and instability of relativistic matter . Communications in Mathematical Physics . June 1988 . 118 . 2 . 177–213 . 10.1007/BF01218577. 1988CMaPh.118..177L . free.
  20. Lieb . Elliott H. . Siedentop . Heinz . Solovej . Jan Philip . Stability and instability of relativistic electrons in classical electromagnetic fields . Journal of Statistical Physics . October 1997 . 89 . 1–2 . 37–59 . 10.1007/BF02770753. cond-mat/9610195 . 1997JSP....89...37L . free.
  21. Frank . Rupert L. . Lieb . Elliott H. . Seiringer . Robert . Stability of Relativistic Matter with Magnetic Fields for Nuclear Charges up to the Critical Value . Communications in Mathematical Physics . 20 August 2007 . 275 . 2 . 479–489 . 10.1007/s00220-007-0307-2. 2007CMaPh.275..479F . free. math-ph/0610062 .
  22. Lieb . Elliott H. . Loss . Michael . Siedentop . Heinz . Stability of relativistic matter via Thomas-Fermi theory . Helvetica Physica Acta . 1 December 1996 . 69 . 5–6 . 974–984 . cond-mat/9608060 . 1996cond.mat..8060L . 0018-0238.
  23. Fefferman . C . Charles Fefferman . Stability of Coulomb systems in a magnetic field. . . 23 May 1995 . 92 . 11 . 5006–5007 . 10.1073/pnas.92.11.5006. 11607547 . 41836 . 1995PNAS...92.5006F . free.
  24. Lieb . Elliott H. . Loss . Michael . Solovej . Jan Philip . Stability of Matter in Magnetic Fields . . 7 August 1995 . 75 . 6 . 985–989 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.985. 10060179 . cond-mat/9506047 . 1995PhRvL..75..985L . 2794188 .
  25. Bugliaro . Luca . Fröhlich . Jürg . Graf . Gian Michele . Stability of Quantum Electrodynamics with Nonrelativistic Matter . . 21 October 1996 . 77 . 17 . 3494–3497 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3494. 10062234 . 1996PhRvL..77.3494B .
  26. Fefferman . Charles . Charles Fefferman . Fröhlich . Jürg . Graf . Gian Michele . Stability of Ultraviolet-Cutoff Quantum Electrodynamics with Non-Relativistic Matter . Communications in Mathematical Physics . 1 December 1997 . 190 . 2 . 309–330 . 10.1007/s002200050243. 1997CMaPh.190..309F . free.
  27. Lieb . Elliott H. . Loss . Michael . Stability of a Model of Relativistic Quantum Electrodynamics . Communications in Mathematical Physics . 1 July 2002 . 228 . 3 . 561–588 . 10.1007/s002200200665. math-ph/0109002 . 2002CMaPh.228..561L . free.
  28. Lundholm . Douglas . Solovej . Jan Philip . Local Exclusion and Lieb–Thirring Inequalities for Intermediate and Fractional Statistics . Annales Henri Poincaré . June 2014 . 15 . 6 . 1061–1107 . 10.1007/s00023-013-0273-5 . 1301.3436 . 2014AnHP...15.1061L . free.
  29. Lundholm . Douglas . Solovej . Jan Philip . Hardy and Lieb-Thirring Inequalities for Anyons . Communications in Mathematical Physics . September 2013 . 322 . 3 . 883–908 . 10.1007/s00220-013-1748-4. 1108.5129 . 2013CMaPh.322..883L . free.
  30. Hainzl . Christian . Lewin . Mathieu . Solovej . Jan Philip . The thermodynamic limit of quantum Coulomb systems Part II. Applications . . June 2009 . 221 . 2 . 488–546 . 10.1016/j.aim.2008.12.011. free. 0806.1709 .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Stability of matter".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2025, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.