Size consistency and size extensivity explained

In quantum chemistry, size consistency and size extensivity are concepts relating to how the behaviour of quantum-chemistry calculations changes with the system size. Size consistency (or strict separability) is a property that guarantees the consistency of the energy behaviour when interaction between the involved molecular subsystems is nullified (for example, by distance). Size extensivity, introduced by Bartlett, is a more mathematically formal characteristic which refers to the correct (linear) scaling of a method with the number of electrons.[1]

Let A and B be two non-interacting systems. If a given theory for the evaluation of the energy is size-consistent, then the energy of the supersystem A + B, separated by a sufficiently large distance such that there is essentially no shared electron density, is equal to the sum of the energy of A plus the energy of B taken by themselves:

E(A+B)=E(A)+E(B).

This property of size consistency is of particular importance to obtain correctly behaving dissociation curves. Others have more recently argued that the entire potential energy surface should be well-defined.[2]

Size consistency and size extensivity are sometimes used interchangeably in the literature. However, there are very important distinctions to be made between them.[3] Hartree–Fock (HF), coupled cluster, many-body perturbation theory (to any order), and full configuration interaction (FCI) are size-extensive but not always size-consistent. For example, the restricted Hartree–Fock model is not able to correctly describe the dissociation curves of H2, and therefore all post-HF methods that employ HF as a starting point will fail in that matter (so-called single-reference methods). Sometimes numerical errors can cause a method that is formally size-consistent to behave in a non-size-consistent manner.[4]

Core extensivity is yet another related property, which extends the requirement to the proper treatment of excited states.[5]

Notes and References

  1. 10.1146/annurev.pc.32.100181.002043 . R. J. . Bartlett . Many-Body Perturbation Theory and Coupled Cluster Theory for Electron Correlation in Molecules . Annual Review of Physical Chemistry . 32 . 359 . 1981 . 1981ARPC...32..359B.
  2. Book: Taylor, P. R. . Lecture Notes in Quantum Chemistry: European Summer School . Springer-Verlag . Berlin . 1994 . 125–202 . Coupled-cluster Methods in Quantum Chemistry . Lecture Notes in Chemistry . 64 . Björn O. . Roos . 10.1007/978-3-642-57890-8_3 . 978-3-642-57890-8.
  3. Web site: Size-Extensivity and Size-Consistency . Uam.es . 1995-01-20 . 2014-02-01 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20170606215414/http://www.uam.es/docencia/quimcursos/Docs/Knowledge/Fundamental_Theory/cc/node7.html . 2017-06-06 .
  4. Van Dam . Huub . Van Lenthe . Joop . Pulay . Peter . The size consistency of multi-reference Møller–Plesset perturbation theory . Molecular Physics . 93 . 431 . 1998 . 10.1080/002689798169122 . 3 . 1998MolPh..93..431V.
  5. Mukhopadhyay . S. . A comparative study of core-extensive and core—valence-extensive coupled-cluster theories for energy differences: Excitation energies . Chemical Physics Letters . 173 . 181. 1990 . 10.1016/0009-2614(90)80074-N . Chaudhuri . Rajat . Mukhopadhyay . Debasis . Mukherjee . Debashis . 2–3 . 1990CPL...173..181M.