Pre-existence explained

Pre-existence, preexistence, beforelife, or premortal existence, is the belief that each individual human soul existed before mortal conception, and at some point before birth enters or is placed into the body. Concepts of pre-existence can encompass either the belief that the soul came into existence at some time prior to conception or the belief that the soul is eternal. Alternative positions are traducianism and creationism, which both hold that the individual human soul does not come into existence until conception or later. It is to be distinguished from preformation, which is about physical existence and applies to all living things.

Ancient Greek thought

See also: Metempsychosis. Plato believed in the pre-existence of the soul, which tied in with his innatism. He thought that we are born with knowledge from a previous life that is subdued at birth and must be relearned. He saw all attainment of knowledge not as acquiring new information, but as remembering previously known information.[1]

Baha'i Faith

Baháʼí literature refers in a number of places to at least four key dimensions of pre-existence. Firstly, that the individual soul of a human being comes into being at the time of conception and only thereafter is eternal; in other words, it is not pre-existent. Secondly, in distinction to the above, that the souls of the world's greatest spiritual teachers, the founders of world religions, are pre-existent. Thirdly, that God, a reality which human consciousness can not comprehend, is pre-existent, that is he exists prior to time and to his creation. Fourthly, that the relationship between God and the phenomenal or contingent world is one of emanation, as the rays of the sun are to the earth. In other words, the pre-existent world of God remains separate from and does not descend into his creation.[2]

Buddhism

In Buddhist cosmology, saṃsāra is the cycle of life and death.[3] When a person dies in earth its human soul is born into the Naraka (underworld or the "purgatories" of the souls) and afterwards it is reborn on earth.[4] Yama, a dharmapala (wrathful god), is said to judge the dead and preside over the Narakas and the cycle.[5]

A being is born into a Naraka as a direct result of its accumulated actions (karma) and resides there for a finite period of time (it varies from hundreds of millions to sextillions of years, but these periods are equivalent to hours or even years in earth time) until that karma has achieved its full result. After its karma is used up, it will be reborn in one of the higher worlds as the result of karma that had not yet ripened. The cycle is completed or finished when the soul reach the Nirvana.[6]

Chinese mythology

In Chinese mythology, the Naihe Bridge (奈何桥), also called the Bridge of Forgetfulness, connects earth with the Diyu ("earth prison"), that is the realm of the dead or purgatory. It is typically depicted as a subterranean maze with various levels and chambers, to which souls are taken after death to atone for the sins they committed when they were alive. The number of levels in Diyu it is said to be three, four, ten or even Eighteen "courts", each of which is ruled by a judge, collectively known as the Yama Kings. The god of the dead is King Yan, it oversees the kings of the courts. Ox-Head and Horse-Face are the guardians of Diyu, and their role is the capture of human souls who have died and bring them before the courts of Hell, where they are rewarded or punished based on the actions performed in their lifetime. Legend has it that the dead who have committed serious sins in life cannot cross the Naihe Bridge and will be pushed into the "Blood River Pool" by Ox-Head and Horse-Face to suffer the torture of insects, ants and snakes, while the dead who have done good deeds will be able to cross the bridge very easily.[7]

The goddess of forgetfulness, Meng Po, serves Meng Po Soup (孟婆汤) on the Naihe Bridge. This soup wipes the memory of the persons before they cross the bridge so they can reincarnate into their next life without the burdens of the previous life. She awaits the dead souls at the entrance of the 9th round (Fengdu). In some variations she is referred as Lady Meng Jiang[8]

Christianity

See also: Pre-existence of Christ. A concept of pre-existence was advanced by Origen, a second and third-century church father.[9] Origen believed that each human soul was created by God[10] at some time prior to conception. He wrote that already "one of [his] predecessors" had interpreted the Scripture to teach pre-existence, which seems to be a reference to the Jewish philosopher Philo.[11]

Some scholars, including John Behr and Marguerite Harl, argue that this idea, condemned by the church, may have been taught by some later Origenists, but that Origen himself was orthodox in this regard and "never used the terms 'pre-existence of souls' or 'pre-existent intellects', and that Origen was talking about realities outside of time and not about any concept of temporality before our time.[12] [13] Such orthodox understandings of Origen also show up in Maximus the Confessor and in the idea of an atemporal fall as taught by Christian theologians Sergei Bulgakov and David Bentley Hart.[14] [15] [16] [17]

Church Fathers Tertullian and Jerome held to traducianism and creationism, respectively, and pre-existence was condemned as heresy in the Second Council of Constantinople in AD 553.[18]

Origen referenced Romans 9:11-14 as evidence for his position:

Notes and References

  1. Book: Givens, Terryl L. . When Souls Had Wings: Pre-Mortal Existence in Western Thought . OUP USA . 2012 . 978-0-19-991685-6 . March 18, 2021 . 31–33.
  2. Web site: 2020-02-15 . The Hidden Nature of Life After Death . 2023-01-26 . BahaiTeachings.org . en-US.
  3. [Saṃsāra (Buddhism)#CITEREFTrainor2004|Trainor 2004]
  4. Braarvig, Jens (2009). "The Buddhist Hell: An Early Instance of the Idea?". Numen. 56 (2–3): 254–281.
  5. Soka Gakkai, Nichiren Buddhism Library
  6. Chad Meister (2009). Introducing Philosophy of Religion. Routledge. p. 25. Buddhism: the soteriological goal is nirvana, liberation from the wheel of samsara and extinction of all desires, cravings and suffering.
  7. Book: Fang Zi . 1 April 2020 . Who is Geli Ou? . Linking Publishing Company . 9789570854701 .
  8. Attribution: Prose in this article was copied from the following pages: Diyu and Meng Po on January 16, 2021. Please see the history of that pages for attribution
  9. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/const2.html Medieval Sourcebook: Fifth Ecumenical Council: Constantinople II, 553
  10. Book: Origen. De Principiis. I.V.3. let us inquire whether God, the creator and founder of all things, created certain of them holy and happy, so that they could admit no element at all of an opposite kind, and certain others so that they were made capable both of virtue and vice; or whether we are to suppose that He created some so as to be altogether incapable of virtue, and others again altogether incapable of wickedness, but with the power of abiding only in a state of happiness, and others again such as to be capable of either condition..
  11. Book: Chadwick . Henry . Origen: Contra Celsum . 1953 . Cambridge University Press . 0-521-29576-9 . 307.
  12. Web site: Orthodox Origen . Joseph T. Lienhard . December 2018 . . 12 February 2023 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20221225112550/https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/12/orthodox-origen . 25 December 2022.
  13. Book: Origen of Alexandria. Origen . Behr . John . John Behr . Introduction . Origen: On First Principles (Oxford Early Christian Texts) . Oxford, UK . Oxford University Press . 7 February 2018 . 9780199684021 .
  14. Web site: Sensus Plenior I: On gods and mortals . subscription . Hart . David Bentley . David Bentley Hart . 31 August 2022 . Leaves in the Wind . 5 February 2023 . First Reader (Aug 31, 2022): Should we favor the ‘atemporal fall’ view then? David Bentley Hart (Aug 31, 2022): Well, I certainly do. But the original Eden story isn't about the ‘fall’ at all, except in the vague sense that it was a mythic aetiology of life's miseries. Second Reader (Sep 2, 2022): Can you briefly describe what you understand or hold the ‘atemporal fall’ to be? Hart (Sep 2, 2022): No, not briefly. Second Reader (Sep 2, 2022): An extended response would, of course, be satisfactory also! But no, if you are aware of any particularly good reflections on it, I’d be grateful for a reference. Hart (Sep 2, 2022): Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb.
  15. Web site: Sergius Bulgakov on Evolution and the Fall: A Sophiological Solution . Gottshall . Charles Andrew . 1 May 2017 . Eclectic Orthodoxy . 9 February 2023 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20221202030046/https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/sergius-bulgakov-on-evolution-and-the-fall-a-sophiological-solution/ . 2 December 2022.
  16. Web site: Origen and the Eschatological Creation of the Cosmos . Behr . John . John Behr . 15 January 2018 . Eclectic Orthodoxy . 5 February 2023 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20230124131351/https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2018/01/15/origen-and-the-eschatological-creation-of-the-cosmos/ . 24 January 2023 . Our beginning in this world and its time can only be thought of as a falling away from that eternal and heavenly reality, to which we are called..
  17. Web site: The Redemption of Evolution: Maximus the Confessor, The Incarnation, and Modern Science . Chenoweth . Mark . Summer 2022 . Jacob’s Well . 5 February 2023 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220814135608/https://issuu.com/jacobswell/docs/jacob_s_well_spring_2022_online_1_ . 14 August 2022.
  18. Web site: The Anathemas Against Origen.