Extended real number line explained
In mathematics, the extended real number system is obtained from the real number system
by adding two elements denoted
and
that are respectively greater and lower than every real number. This allows for treating the
potential infinities of infinitely increasing sequences and infinitely decreasing series as
actual infinities. For example, the
infinite sequence
of the
natural numbers increases
infinitively and has no
upper bound in the real number system (a potential infinity); in the extended real number line, the sequence has
as its
least upper bound and as its
limit (an actual infinity). In
calculus and
mathematical analysis, the use of
and
as actual limits extends significantly the possible computations.
[1] It is the
Dedekind–MacNeille completion of the real numbers.
The extended real number system is denoted
or
or When the meaning is clear from context, the symbol
is often written simply as
There is also a distinct projectively extended real line where
and
are not distinguished, i.e., there is a single actual infinity for both infinitely increasing sequences and infinitely decreasing sequences that is denoted as just
or as
.
Motivation
Limits
when either the
argument
or the function value
gets "infinitely large" in some sense. For example, consider the function
defined by
The graph of this function has a horizontal asymptote at
Geometrically, when moving increasingly farther to the right along the
-axis, the value of
approaches . This limiting behavior is similar to the
limit of a function in which the
real number
approaches
except that there is no real number that
approaches when
increases infinitely. Adjoining the elements
and
to
enables a definition of "limits at infinity" which is very similar to the usual defininion of limits, except that
is replaced by
(for
) or
(for
). This allows proving and writing
\begin{align}
\limx
&=0,\\
\limx
&=0,\\
\limx
&=+infty.
\end{align}
Measure and integration
In measure theory, it is often useful to allow sets that have infinite measure and integrals whose value may be infinite.
Such measures arise naturally out of calculus. For example, in assigning a measure to
that agrees with the usual length of
intervals, this measure must be larger than any finite real number. Also, when considering
improper integrals, such as
the value "infinity" arises. Finally, it is often useful to consider the limit of a sequence of functions, such as
fn(x)=\begin{cases}
2n(1-nx),&if0\leqx\leq
\\
0,&if
<x\leq1
\end{cases}
Without allowing functions to take on infinite values, such essential results as the monotone convergence theorem and the dominated convergence theorem would not make sense.
Order and topological properties
The extended real number system
, defined as
or
, can be turned into a
totally ordered set by defining
for all
With this
order topology,
has the desirable property of
compactness: Every
subset of
has a
supremum and an
infimum[2] (the infimum of the
empty set is
, and its supremum is
). Moreover, with this
topology,
is
homeomorphic to the
unit interval
Thus the topology is
metrizable, corresponding (for a given homeomorphism) to the ordinary
metric on this interval. There is no metric, however, that is an extension of the ordinary metric on
In this topology, a set
is a
neighborhood of
if and only if it contains a set
for some real number
The notion of the neighborhood of
can be defined similarly. Using this characterization of extended-real neighborhoods,
limits with
tending to
or
, and limits "equal" to
and
, reduce to the general topological definition of limits—instead of having a special definition in the real number system.
Arithmetic operations
The arithmetic operations of
can be partially extended to
as follows:
is often defined as
When dealing with both positive and negative extended real numbers, the expression
is usually left undefined, because, although it is true that for every real nonzero sequence
that
converges to
the
reciprocal sequence
is eventually contained in every neighborhood of
it is
not true that the sequence
must itself converge to either
or
Said another way, if a
continuous function
achieves a zero at a certain value
then it need not be the case that
tends to either
or
in the limit as
tends to
This is the case for the limits of the
identity function
when
tends to
and of
f(x)=x2\sin\left(1/x\right)
(for the latter function, neither
nor
is a limit of
even if only positive values of
are considered).
However, in contexts where only non-negative values are considered, it is often convenient to define
For example, when working with
power series, the
radius of convergence of a power series with
coefficients
is often defined as the reciprocal of the
limit-supremum of the sequence
. Thus, if one allows
to take the value
then one can use this formula regardless of whether the limit-supremum is
or not.
Algebraic properties
With the arithmetic operations defined above,
is not even a
semigroup, let alone a
group, a
ring or a
field as in the case of
However, it has several convenient properties:
and
are either equal or both undefined.
and
are either equal or both undefined.
and
are either equal or both undefined.
and
are either equal or both undefined
and
are equal if both are defined.
and if both
and
are defined, then
and
and if both
and
are defined, then
In general, all laws of arithmetic are valid in
as long as all occurring expressions are defined.
Miscellaneous
Several functions can be continuously extended to
by taking limits. For instance, one may define the extremal points of the following functions as:
Some singularities may additionally be removed. For example, the function
can be continuously extended to
(under
some definitions of continuity), by setting the value to
for
and
for
and
On the other hand, the function
can
not be continuously extended, because the function approaches
as
approaches
from below, and
as
approaches
from above, i.e., the function not converging to the same value as its independent variable approaching to the same domain element from both the positive and negative value sides.
A similar but different real-line system, the projectively extended real line, does not distinguish between
and
(i.e. infinity is unsigned).
[3] As a result, a function may have limit
on the projectively extended real line, while in the extended real number system only the
absolute value of the function has a limit, e.g. in the case of the function
at
On the other hand, on the projectively extended real line,
and
correspond to only a limit from the right and one from the left, respectively, with the full limit only existing when the two are equal. Thus, the functions
and
cannot be made continuous at
on the projectively extended real line.
See also
References
- Web site: Section 6: The Extended Real Number System. Wilkins. David. 2007. maths.tcd.ie. 2019-12-03.
- Book: Oden . J. Tinsley . Demkowicz. Leszek. Applied Functional Analysis . 16 January 2018 . Chapman and Hall/CRC . 9781498761147 . 74 . 3 . 8 December 2019 .
- Web site: Projectively Extended Real Numbers. Weisstein. Eric W.. mathworld.wolfram.com. en. 2019-12-03.