| The Square Ring | |
| Director: | Basil Dearden |
| Producer: | Michael Relph executive Michael Balcon |
| Based On: | the play by Ralph Peterson |
| Music: | Dock Mathieson |
| Cinematography: | Otto Heller |
| Studio: | Ealing Studios |
| Editing: | Peter Bezencenet |
| Distributor: | GFD (UK) |
| Runtime: | 83 minutes |
| Country: | United Kingdom |
| Language: | English |
The Square Ring is a 1953 British tragi-comic drama, directed by Basil Dearden and made at Ealing Studios. It stars Jack Warner, Robert Beatty and Maxwell Reed. The film, based on a 1952 stage play by Ralph Peterson, centres on one night at a fairly seedy boxing venue and tells the disparate stories of the fighters and the women behind them.
Six stories that take place mainly in the locker room prior to and after various bouts during a single evening at a cheap boxing stadium: ex-champion Kid Curtis (the Docker Starkie role in the original play) attempting a comeback; Eddie Lloyd, a former amateur boxer making his professional debut; ‘Happy’ Burns a chirpy lightweight; Rick Martell, a crooked fighter planning to throw a fight; Whitey Johnson, a punch drunk ‘has-been’; and Rowdie Rawlings, a simple heavyweight. Danny Felton is the experienced ex-pro dressing room attendant.
The play debuted in October 1952 and was immediately successful. Film rights were bought by Michael Balcon at Ealing. In November 1952 he announced John Mills would star, with Basil Dearden to direct and Michael Relph to produce.[1] Relph later said he was reluctant to make the film as he felt box movies were bad box office.[2]
Eventually Mills dropped out and was replaced by Canadian actor Robert Beatty.[3] He had no boxing experience so he trained for two weeks with Dave Crowley in preparation for the role.[4]
The play was all male but three women were added to the film.[5] The women included Kay Kendall and Joan Collins, who were both under contract to Rank. Kendall had just made Genevieve but it had not been released. Collins appeared opposite then husband Maxwell Reed.[6]
Critical reception was mixed.[7] One review called the film "uneven", accusing it of "veering between comedy and tragedy".[8]