Debate has occurred throughout Asia over proposals to legalize same-sex marriage as well as civil unions.
Following a Constitutional Court ruling and a subsequent legislative act, Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage nationwide on 24 May 2019.[1]
The Supreme Court Of India in a landmark decision on 16 August 2022 widened the definition of family under Indian law. This case has allowed for further recognition of live-in relationships of LGBT couples.[2]
In addition, Israel recognises same-sex marriages performed abroad, though not as full marriage, and same-sex marriages are legal in the UK sovereign base areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia and the British Indian Ocean Territory.
Israel recognises unregistered cohabitation for same-sex couples.[3] Some cities in Cambodia provide same-sex couples with some limited rights and benefits, including hospital visitation rights.[4] [5] Several prefectures in Japan issue partnership certificates for same-sex couples.[6] [7] [8] In Hong Kong, the same-sex partners of residents can receive spousal visas and spousal benefits.[9] [10]
Status | Country | Legal since | Country population (Last Census count) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marriage (2 countries) | Taiwan | 2019 | 23,576,705 | |
Thailand | 2025 | 69,183,173 | ||
Subtotal | — | align=center | — | 92,759,878 (1.9% of the Asian population) |
Civil unions (1 country) | Cyprus | align=center | 2015 | 1,117,000 |
Subtotal | — | align=center | — | 1,117,000 (0.05% of the Asian population) |
Limited cohabitation (3 countries) | India | align=center | 2022 | 1,336,740,000 |
Israel | align=center | 2006 | 8,910,800 | |
Nepal | 2024 | 29,218,867 | ||
Subtotal | — | align=center | — | 1,374,869,679 (29.71% of the Asian population) |
Total | — | align=center | — | 1,468,746,545 (30.75% of the Asian population) |
No recognition (39 countries) * same-sex sexual activity illegal | Afghanistan* | — | 31,575,018 | |
Azerbaijan | align=center | — | 9,898,085 | |
Bahrain | align=center | — | 1,496,300 | |
Bangladesh* | align=center | — | 165,159,000 | |
Bhutan | align=center | — | 727,145 | |
Brunei* | align=center | — | 422,678 | |
China | align=center | — | 1,393,970,000 | |
East Timor | align=center | — | 1,261,407 | |
align=center | — | 265,015,300 | ||
Iran* | align=center | — | 81,773,300 | |
Iraq* | align=center | — | 39,339,753 | |
Japan | align=center | — | 126,490,000 | |
Jordan | align=center | — | 10,235,500 | |
Kazakhstan | align=center | — | 18,272,400 | |
Kuwait* | align=center | — | 4,226,920 | |
Laos | align=center | — | 6,961,210 | |
Lebanon | align=center | — | 6,093,509 | |
Malaysia* | align=center | — | 32,663,200 | |
Maldives* | align=center | — | 378,114 | |
Myanmar* | align=center | — | 53,862,731 | |
North Korea | align=center | — | 25,610,672 | |
Oman* | align=center | — | 4,633,752 | |
Pakistan* | align=center | — | 201,938,000 | |
Philippines | align=center | — | 106,438,000 | |
Qatar* | align=center | — | 2,450,285 | |
Saudi Arabia* | align=center | — | 33,413,660 | |
Singapore | align=center | — | 5,612,253 | |
South Korea | align=center | — | 51,635,256 | |
Sri Lanka* | align=center | — | 21,444,000 | |
Syria* | align=center | — | 18,284,407 | |
Tajikistan | align=center | — | 8,931,000 | |
Turkey | align=center | — | 80,810,525 | |
Turkmenistan* | align=center | — | 5,851,466 | |
United Arab Emirates* | align=center | — | 9,541,615 | |
Uzbekistan* | align=center | — | 32,653,900 | |
Vietnam | align=center | — | 94,660,000 | |
Yemen* | align=center | — | 28,915,284 | |
Subtotal | — | align=center | — | 2,982,645,645 (65.37% of the Asian population) |
Constitutional ban on marriage (6 countries) | Armenia | align=center | 2015 | 2,969,800 |
Cambodia | align=center | 1993 | 16,069,921 | |
Georgia | 2018 | 3,729,600 | ||
Kyrgyzstan | align=center | 2016 | 6,309,300 | |
Mongolia | align=center | 1992 | 3,225,080 | |
Russia | align=center | 2020 | 146,877,088 | |
Subtotal | — | align=center | — | 179,180,789 (3.9% of the Asian population) |
Total | — | align=center | — | 3,161,826,434 (70.54% of the Asian population) |
Status | Country | Jurisdiction | Legal since | Jurisdiction population(Last Census count) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marriage(2 jurisdictions) | United Kingdom | Akrotiri and Dhekelia | 2014 | 15,700 | |
British Indian Ocean Territory | 2014 | 3,000 (military personnel only) | |||
Total | 18,700 |
Status | Country | Since | State population (Last estimate count) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
No recognition (4 states) * same-sex sexual activity illegal | Abkhazia | align=center | — | 242,862 |
Northern Cyprus | 313,626 | |||
Palestine*[11] | align=center | — | 4,780,978 | |
South Ossetia | align=center | — | 53,532 | |
Total | — | align=center | — | 5,390,998 (0.1% of the Asian population) |
A bill was introduced by the opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan in March 2023.[12]
In 2022, two same-sex civil union bills were proposed to the Philippine Congress. The first bill, named the "Civil Partnership Act", was proposed by Bagong Henerasyon party-list representative Bernadette Herrera-Dy in July 2022. This bill would provide recognition of same-sex couples in the Philippines and grant them the same benefits and protections as opposite-sex married couples on a national level. This bill was also proposed in previous Congresses, but did not pass.[13] In August 2022, senator Robin Padilla proposed a similar bill named the "Civil Unions Act", which would provide benefits and protections for same-sex couples similar to Herrera-Dy's, as well as inheritance rights, adoption rights, and other privileges granted to married couples.[14] In February 2023, Davao del Norte 1st District Rep. Pantaleon Alvarez proposed a new Civil Partnership Bill, which allows both same-sex and opposite-sex couples to enter into a civil partnership and enjoy equal rights and protection under the law[15]
In 2019, a survey by The Economist found that 45% of respondents in the Asia-Pacific region believed same-sex marriage is inevitable in the region, with 31% of respondents disagreeing. Also, three-quarters of those surveyed reported a more open climate for LGBT rights compared to three years ago. Of those reporting an improving climate for LGBT people, 38% cited a change in policies or laws, while 36% said coverage of LGBT issues in mainstream media was a major factor. The top reason cited for diminishing openness was anti-LGBT advocacy by religious institutions.[16] [17]