| Litigants: | Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc. |
| Arguedatea: | February 24 |
| Arguedateb: | 25 |
| Argueyear: | 1960 |
| Decidedate: | April 18 |
| Decideyear: | 1960 |
| Fullname: | Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc. |
| Usvol: | 362 |
| Uspage: | 373 |
| Parallelcitations: | 80 S. Ct. 792; 4 L. Ed. 2d 804; 125 U.S.P.Q. 147 |
| Prior: | 158 F. Supp. 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1957); affirmed, 265 F.2d 925 (2d Cir. 1959); cert. granted, . |
| Holding: | The executor of a copyright holder's will is eligible to renew that copyright. |
| Majority: | Douglas |
| Joinmajority: | Warren, Black, Clark, Brennan |
| Dissent: | Harlan |
| Joindissent: | Frankfurter, Whittaker, Stewart |
Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc., 362 U.S. 373 (1960), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the executor of a copyright holder's will is eligible to renew that copyright.[1]