Six referendums were held in Switzerland during 2010; three in March on pension funds, animal protection and a constitutional amendment, one in September on unemployment benefits, and two in November on deporting foreign criminals and introducing a canton tax.
Voters approved Provision 1, an amendment to the constitution on research on humans.
Choice | Votes | % | Cantons | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full | Half | Total | ||||
For | 1,708,488 | 77.21 | 20 | 6 | 23 | |
Against | 504,167 | 22.79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Invalid/blank votes | 84,893 | – | – | – | – | |
Total | 2,297,548 | 100 | 20 | 6 | 23 | |
Registered voters/turnout | 5,051,169 | 45.49 | – | – | – | |
Source[1] |
Voters rejected Provision 2, a federal decree on providing enhanced legal protection for animals.
Choice | Votes | % | Cantons | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full | Half | Total | ||||
For | 671,731 | 29.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Against | 1,605,141 | 70.50 | 20 | 6 | 23 | |
Invalid/blank votes | 37,618 | – | – | – | – | |
Total | 2,314,490 | 100 | 20 | 6 | 23 | |
Registered voters/turnout | 5,051,169 | 45.82 | – | – | – | |
Source[2] |
Voters also rejected Provision 3, a federal law which would change the minimum conversion rate for occupational and disability pension plans.[3]
Choice | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
For | 617,209 | 27.27 | |
Against | 1,646,369 | 72.73 | |
Invalid/blank votes | 47,474 | – | |
Total | 2,311,052 | 100 | |
Registered voters/turnout | 5,051,169 | 45.75 | |
Source[4] |
The referendum held on 26 September had a single topic, namely the revision of unemployment benefits. The centre and right-wing parties were in favour of the revision, which was undertaken to reduce the debt of the ALV, while the left-wing parties were against it.[5]
The referendum was approved by 53.4% of voters, although only the German-speaking cantons (all of them except Basel-Stadt, which was against it with 50.4%) approved it.[6] [7]
Choice | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
For | 958,913 | 53.42 | |
Against | 836,101 | 46.58 | |
Invalid/blank votes | 24,463 | – | |
Total | 1,819,477 | 100 | |
Registered voters/turnout | 5,077,180 | 35.84 | |
Source[8] |
The referendum held on 28 November had two issues:
The SVP's federal popular initiative on deportation was accepted with 52.2% and a majority of cantons in favour, while the counterproposal failed with only 44.5% in favour. Whilst it was not required, the tie-breaker showed a majority of voters against but a majority of cantons for. On 28 February 2016, a follow-up initiative, also launched by the SVP, was rejected by voters.[10] [11] [12] The deportation initiative went in effect on 1 October 2016.[12]
Question | For | Against | Blank | Invalid votes | Total | Registered voters | Turnout | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Cantons | Votes | % | Cantons | Votes | % | ||||||||||
Full | Half | Total | Full | Half | Total | ||||||||||||
Proposal | 1,397,923 | 52.26 | 15 | 5 | 17.5 | 1,243,942 | 46.51 | 5 | 1 | 5.5 | 32,762 | 1.23 | 16,172 | 2,690,799 | 5,084,053 | 52.93 | |
Counter-proposal | 1,189,269 | 44.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,407,830 | 52.64 | 20 | 6 | 23 | 77,528 | 2.90 | 16,172 | 2,690,799 | 5,084,053 | 52.93 | |
Source[13] |
Tie-breaker | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Choice | Votes | % | Cantons | |||
Full | Half | Total | ||||
Proposal | 1,252,761 | 46.84 | 13 | 4 | 15 | |
Counter-proposal | 1,271,365 | 47.53 | 7 | 2 | 8 | |
Blank | 150,501 | 5.63 | – | – | – | |
Invalid votes | 16,172 | – | – | – | – | |
Total | 2,690,799 | 100 | 20 | 3 | 23 | |
Registered voters/turnout | 5'084'053 | 52.93 | – | – | – | |
Source: Direct Democracy |
The taxation initiative failed with only 41.5% in favour.
Choice | Votes | % | Cantons | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full | Half | Total | ||||
For | 1,073,229 | 41.54 | 3 | 1 | 3.5 | |
Against | 1,510,589 | 58.46 | 17 | 5 | 19.5 | |
Invalid/blank votes | 78,292 | – | – | – | – | |
Total | 2,662,110 | 100 | 20 | 6 | 23 | |
Registered voters/turnout | 5,084,053 | 52.36 | – | – | – | |
Source[14] |
In August 2010, family members of a murder victim launched another constitutional amendment initiative to provide for capital punishment in cases of murder combined with sexual violence. The initiative quickly found itself at the center of public attention and was roundly rejected by political leaders; it was withdrawn a day after its official publication.[15]