Kēlen | |
Creator: | Sylvia Sotomayor |
Created: | 1998 |
Setting: | alien species (the Kēleñi) |
Fam2: | artistic language |
Posteriori: | a priori language, consciously rejecting linguistic universals to create an alien language |
Iso3: | none |
Glotto: | none |
Ietf: | art-x-kelen |
Kēlen (IPA: [ˈkeː.len]) is a constructed language created by Sylvia Sotomayor in 1998. The language is designed to be a truly alien language by violating a key linguistic universal — namely that all human languages have verbs. In Kēlen, relationships between noun phrases making up the sentence are expressed by one of four relationals. According to Sotomayor, these relationals perform the functions of verbs but lack any of the semantic content.[1] However, the semantic content found in common verbs, such as those that are semantic primes, can also be found in Kēlen's relationals,[2] which calls into question whether Kēlen is technically verbless. Despite its distinctive grammar, Kēlen is an expressive and intelligible language.[3] Texts written in Kēlen have been translated into other languages by several people other than the creator of the language.[4] In an interview, Sotomayor stated that she aimed for Kēlen to be naturalistic apart from its verblessness, and that to achieve this she employs the principle "change one thing and keep everything else the same".[5]
In its concultural setting, Kēlen is spoken by an alien species called the Kēleñi, for whom the language was created.
Kēlen has gained recognition and acclaim within the conlanging community. It is mentioned prominently by Sarah L. Higley in her book Hildegard of Bingen's Unknown Language: An edition, translation and discussion (Palgrave Macmillan 2007), The New Middle Ages,) where she discusses Lingua Ignota in the context of constructed languages up to the present day. Higley describes Kēlen as an example of the desire for originality in contemporary conlanging, by virtue of its verbless grammar, and notes that it is a prominent example of a conlang created by a woman. She also says that "fellow conlangers consider Kēlen to be efficient, elegant, strange and innovative, and its writing system is greatly admired."Kēlen is also discussed at length in a book by M. Yu. Sidorova and O.N. Shuvalova, including several glossed examples.[6]
At the third Language Creation Conference David J. Peterson awarded the Smiley Award to Kēlen, describing it as "an engineered language with the soul of an artistic language". Peterson explains that while its experimental structure is in many ways similar to an engineered language, the amount of linguistic and concultural detail given by Sotomayor (including inflection of the relationals, three different scripts, and information on Kēleñi culture and society such as a calendar and a method of divination) make it a fully-fledged artistic project rather than a simple experiment.[7]
Labial | Dental | Alveolar | Post- Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |||
Plosive | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |||
Fricative | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |
Lateral | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |||||
Trill | pronounced as /link/ |
Sylvia Sotomayor analyses the voiceless alveolar fricative /s/ as a stop, because "it used to be [pronounced] like German /z/ or /ts/. This pronunciation is still found in some dialects."[8] In addition, all sonorants, except /ʎ/, can be geminated, as follows: mm /mː/, nn /nː/, ññ /ɲː/, ŋŋ /ŋː/, ll /lː/, rr /rː/.
Kēlen has the same five monophthongs as in Spanish, with the addition of vowel length and diphthongs making it similar to the system found in Hawaiian. Some dialects also use a central short monophthong.
Short | Long | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Front | Central | Back | Front | Back | ||
Close | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |
Mid | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | ||
Open | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ |
Sotomayor specifies that when any two vowels appear next to one another that are not specified as being read as diphthongs, they are instead spoken as two separate vowels.
i- | ie pronounced as //je// | ||
---|---|---|---|
a- | ae pronounced as //aj// | ao pronounced as //aw// |
i- | iē pronounced as //jeː// | ||
---|---|---|---|
a- | āe pronounced as //aːj// | āo pronounced as //aːw// |
Kēlen uses a (C)V(C) syllable structure.[9]
The romanization of Kēlen is given in the phonology section next to the phonemes that each Latin character represents. However, Kēlen also features three original writing systems by Sylvia Sotomayor.
The word order of Kēlen depends upon the relational used in a given sentence. However, adjectives always come after nouns.[13]
Personal pronouns in Kēlen have singular, dual, paucal, and plural forms, as well as distinctions of clusivity in the first-person.
1st Person | Exclusive | liēn | liēnne | lēim | liēþ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inclusive | liēr | ñēim | ñiēþ | |||
2nd Person | riēn | riēnne | rēim | riēþ | ||
3rd Person | sāen | sāenne | sāim | sāeþ |
1st Person | le | |
---|---|---|
2nd Person | ri | |
3rd Person | Animate | ma |
Inanimate | ja |
There are three demonstrative pronouns in Kēlen, distinguishing between the proximal, medial, and distal. They can be used as adjectives, and "generally follow the noun they modify, but can immediately precede it. They can also be used to reference a previously mentioned noun. However, in certain contexts, the noun they are assumed to modify is 'place'". The table below outlines potential uses of the demonstrative pronouns.
Kēlen Pronoun | Usage | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
As Modifier | As Standalone | |||
Proximal | xō | this | here | |
Medial | þō | that | there | |
Distal | āke | that other | yonder |
Existential | Universal | Negative | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributive | Non-Distributive | ||||
Singular | Animate | manahan | |||
Inanimate | janahan | ||||
Collective | Animate | manaren | mawae | ||
Inanimate | janaren | jawae | |||
Plural | Animate | honahan | mannarien | honnarien | howae |
Inanimate | jannarien |
Kēlen makes extensive use of a system of animacy, with a set of mandatory prefixes on all noun stems, the usage of which depends upon the speaker's view of what they are talking about. Sotomayor provides an animacy hierarchy as follows, with 1 being the most likely to be considered animate by any given speaker, and 7 the least:
Prefixes are given for animate, inanimate, and possessed nouns. Sotomayor describes the latter as "[referring] to those inanimates that are considered to be part of a person, such as body parts."
Prefix | ||
---|---|---|
Animate | m(a)- | |
Inanimate | j(a)- | |
an | ||
1st Person Possessed | l(e)- | |
2nd Person Possessed | r(i)- | |
3rd Person Possessed | s(a)- |
Kēlen's nouns are suffixed for grammatical number, distinguishing between the singular and the plural. The suffixes used for the singular are dependent upon the ending of the noun stem, and the suffixes for the plural depend upon the animacy.
| - | |
---|---|---|
| -e | |
Everywhere else | -a |
Animate | -ien |
---|---|
Inanimate | -i |
Possessed |
According to Sotomayor, in lieu of verbs Kēlen uses four so-called "Relationals". She describes these on her site with examples of the potential uses of each within the context of larger sentences, with the abbreviation "NP" for "Noun Phrase".
La is the relational of existence: "La is used to express a static state, a location, or equivalence." It inflects for tense, aspect, and modality.
Pattern | English equivalent | |
---|---|---|
LA NP | NP exists, there is NP | |
LA NP LOC (NP) | NP is at a location | |
LA NP (ñe) NP | NP is (the same as) NP | |
LA NP pa NP | NP is/has/contains NP |
Ñi is the relational of change: "Ñi is used to express a coming into existence, a change in state (when the noun phrase that is the object of ñi has more than one noun in it), or a change in location." Ñi inflects for agent.
Pattern | English Equivalent | |
---|---|---|
ÑI NP | NP (now) exists, N1 is (now) N2 | |
ÑI NP ā|tō NP|NP (now) exists, because of volitional|non-volitional NP | ||
ÑI NP LOC (NP) | NP is to/from a location |
Se is the transactional relational, "Se is used to express giving and receiving, with the object given or received as the object of se and the giver as the source and the receiver as the beneficiary. This pattern is extended to encompass speech and information. Se is also used to express sensing and experiencing of mental states." Se inflects for source, beneficiary and tense.
Pattern | English Equivalent | |
---|---|---|
SE(.SRC;BEN) NP | SRC gives NP to BEN or BEN receives NP from SRC | |
SE(.SRC;BEN) NP ke|to NP mo NP | SRC gives NP to BEN or BEN receives NP from SRC | |
SE(.SRC;BEN) NP ien X | SRC says or expresses NP or BEN hears NP and NP=X | |
SE.BEN NP | BEN experiences/senses NP | |
SE N | N is introduced. |
Pa is the most recent relational in-fiction, "In many ways it expresses the same thing as LA NP pa NP", but indicates a passive meaning. Pa is never inflected.