| Imagealt: | Consumer Protection Act, 299 |
| Citation: | Act No. 68 of 1986 |
| Enacted By: | Parliament of India |
| Date Commenced: | 24 December 1986 |
| Repealed By: | Consumer Protection Act, 2019 |
| Status: | Repealed |
Consumer Protection Act 1986 (COPRA) was an Act by the Parliament of India elected to protect the interests of consumers in India. It was replaced by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. It was made for the establishment of consumer councils and other authorities for the settlement of consumer's dispute and matters connected with it. The act was passed in Assembly in October 1986 and came into force on 24 December 1986.
Consumer rights in India were historically overlooked, leading to rampant exploitation of consumers by businesses. This necessitated the creation of a robust legislation to protect consumers from unfair practices, hence the 'Consumer Protection Act, 1986' was introduced.
This Act is regarded as the 'Magna Carta' in the field of consumer protection for checking unfair trade practices, ‘defects in goods’ and ‘deficiencies in services’ as far as India is concerned. It has led to the establishment of a widespread network of consumer forums and appellate courts all over India. It has significantly impacted how businesses approach consumers and have empowered consumers to a greater extent.[1]
Consumer Protection Councils are established at the national, state and district level to increase consumer awareness. They guide consumers on how to file cases in the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions.[2]
To increase the awareness of consumers, there are many consumer organization and NGOs that have been established. Consumer Guidance Society of India (CGSI) was the first consumer organization established in India in 1966; It was followed by many others such as:
See main article: Consumer Court.
The objectives of the Central Council are to promote and protect the rights of the consumers such as:-
a) – the opposite party or each of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or has a branch office or personally works for gain, or
b) – any of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business or has a branch office, or personally works for gain, provided that in such case either the permission of the District Forum is given, or the opposite parties who do not reside, or carry on business or have a branch office, or personally work for gain, as the case may be, acquiesce in such institution; or
c) – the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises.
Consumer courts do not have jurisdiction over matters where services or goods were bought for a commercial purpose.[4]
Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the State Commission shall have jurisdiction:-
a) to entertain :
i) complaints where the value of the goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed exceeds rupees one crore but does not exceed rupees ten crore; and
ii) appeals against the orders of any District Forum within the State; and
b) to call for the records and pass appropriate orders in any consumer dispute
(a) to entertain—
(i) complaints where the value of the goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed exceeds rupees ten crore; and
(ii) appeals against the orders of any State mayor; and
(b) to call for the records and pass appropriate orders in any consumer dispute which is pending before or has been decided by any State Commission. However, the Supreme Court of India has held that the jurisdiction of National Commission under Revision Jurisdiction is very limited and can only be exercised when State Commission exceeds its jurisdiction, fails to exercise its jurisdiction or there is material illegality in the order passed by State Commission.[5]