Colunga | |
Settlement Type: | Municipality |
Flag Size: | 150 |
Pushpin Map: | Spain |
Pushpin Map Caption: | Location in Spain |
Subdivision Type: | Country |
Subdivision Name: | Spain |
Subdivision Type1: | Autonomous community |
Subdivision Type2: | Province |
Subdivision Name2: | Asturias |
Subdivision Type3: | Comarca |
Subdivision Name3: | Oriente |
Subdivision Type4: | Judicial district |
Subdivision Name4: | Villaviciosa |
Seat Type: | Capital |
Seat: | Colunga |
Coordinates: | 43.4861°N -5.2703°W |
Elevation Max M: | 1159 |
Area Total Km2: | 97.57 |
Population Demonym: | colungués / colunguesa |
Population Density Km2: | auto |
Blank Name Sec1: | Official language(s) |
Timezone: | CET |
Utc Offset: | +1 |
Timezone Dst: | CEST |
Utc Offset Dst: | +2 |
Postal Code Type: | Postal code |
Postal Code: | 33320 - 33340 |
Area Code Type: | Dialing code |
Leader Title: | Alcalde |
Leader Name: | José Rogelio Pando |
Leader Party: | PSOE |
Colunga (pronounced as /es/) is a municipality in the Autonomous community of the Principality of Asturias, Spain. It lies on the Cantabrian Sea, and is bordered to the west by Villaviciosa, to the south by Parres and Piloña, and to the east by Caravia.
Partido | 1979 | 1983 | 1987[1] | 1991 | 1995 | 1999 | 2003 | 2007 | 2011[2] | 2015 | |
PSOE | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
CD / AP / PP | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | |
FAC | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
PCE / IU-BA / IU-The Greens | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
UCD / CDS | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
Agrupación Independiente por Colunga | 2 | ||||||||||
Electores por Colunga | 2 | ||||||||||
URAS / URAS-PAS | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Independents | 3 | ||||||||||
Total | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
The capital of the municipality is the parish with the same name. Its population is 1,132 (INE 2007) and it is divided in five villages: Cimavilla, El Ferreru, Friera, Loreto and El Sorriberu.
On September 29, 2006, millions of anchovies, constituting a weight of over three tons, beached themselves near Colunga. Tests on the dead fish did not detect any toxic chemical that could have caused the beaching, and the current working theory is that the shoal beached itself trying to escape from "hungry dolphins or tuna." If the beached specimens had grown to maturity, it would have been more than "100 tons of potential breeders."[3]