In geometry, the Clifton–Pohl torus is an example of a compact Lorentzian manifold that is not geodesically complete. While every compact Riemannian manifold is also geodesically complete (by the Hopf–Rinow theorem), this space shows that the same implication does not generalize to pseudo-Riemannian manifolds.[1] It is named after Yeaton H. Clifton and William F. Pohl, who described it in 1962 but did not publish their result.[2]
Consider the manifold
M=R2\setminus\{0\}
g=
2dxdy | |
x2+y2 |
Any homothety is an isometry of
M
λ(x,y)=(2x,2y)
Let
\Gamma
λ
\Gamma
M
T=M/\Gamma,
M
\pm1
It can be verified that the curve
\sigma(t):=\left(
1 | |
1-t |
,0\right)
is a null geodesic of M that is not complete (since it is not defined at
t=1
M
T
T
\sigma(t):=(\tan(t),1)
is also a null geodesic that is incomplete. In fact, every null geodesic on
M
T
The geodesic incompleteness of the Clifton–Pohl torus is better seen as a direct consequence of the fact that
(M,g)
N=\left(-\pi/2,\pi/2\right)2\smallsetminus\{0\};
consider
F:N\toM
F(u,v):=(\tan(u),\tan(v)).
The metric
F*g
g
(u,v)
\widehat{g}=
dudv | |
\tfrac{1 |
{2}(\cos(u)2\sin(v)2+\sin(u)2\cos(v)2)}.
But this metric extends naturally from
N
R2\smallsetminusΛ
Λ=\left\{\tfrac\pi2(k,\ell) \mid (k,\ell)\inZ2,k+\ell\equiv0\pmod2\right\}.
The surface
(R2\smallsetminusΛ,\widehat{g})
The Clifton–Pohl tori are also remarkable by the fact that they were the first known non-flat Lorentzian tori with no conjugate points. The extended Clifton–Pohl plane contains a lot of pairs of conjugate points, some of them being in the boundary of
(-\pi/2,\pi/2)2
M