Bateman polynomials explained
In mathematics, the Bateman polynomials are a family Fn of orthogonal polynomials introduced by . The Bateman–Pasternack polynomials are a generalization introduced by .
Bateman polynomials can be defined by the relation
\right)\operatorname{sech}(x)=\operatorname{sech}(x)Pn(\tanh(x)).
where
Pn is a
Legendre polynomial. In terms of
generalized hypergeometric functions, they are given by
Fn(x)={}3F2\left(\begin{array}{c}-n,~n+1,~\tfrac12(x+1)\ 1,~1\end{array};1\right).
generalized the Bateman polynomials to polynomials F with
\right)\operatorname{sech}m+1(x)=\operatorname{sech}m+1(x)Pn(\tanh(x))
These generalized polynomials also have a representation in terms of generalized hypergeometric functions, namely
2\left(\begin{array}{c}-n,~n+1,~\tfrac12(x+m+1)\ 1,~m+1\end{array};1\right).
showed that the polynomials Qn studied by, see Touchard polynomials, are the same as Bateman polynomials up to a change of variable: more precisely
nn!\binom{2n}{n}-1Fn(2x+1)
Bateman and Pasternack's polynomials are special cases of the symmetric continuous Hahn polynomials.
Examples
The polynomials of small n read
Properties
Orthogonality
The Bateman polynomials satisfy the orthogonality relation[1] [2]
Fm(ix)F
\right)dx=
\deltamn.
The factor
occurs on the right-hand side of this equation because the Bateman polynomials as defined here must be scaled by a factor
to make them remain real-valued for imaginary argument. The orthogonality relation is simpler when expressed in terms of a modified set of polynomials defined by
, for which it becomes
Bm(x)B
\right)dx=
\deltamn.
Recurrence relation
The sequence of Bateman polynomials satisfies the recurrence relation[3]
Generating function
The Bateman polynomials also have the generating function
which is sometimes used to define them.
[4] References
- Nadhla A. . Al-Salam. A class of hypergeometric polynomials. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.. 1967 . 75. 1 . 95–120 . 10.1007/BF02416800. free.
Notes and References
- Koelink (1996)
- Bateman, H. (1934), "The polynomial
", Ann. Math. 35 (4): 767-775.
- Bateman (1933), p. 28.
- Bateman (1933), p. 23.